### Abstract

Two instructors in a secondary preservice teacher preparation program address the need to better prepare future teachers for the increasing role project-based learning has taken on in K-12 education. We describe an integrated instructional planning course where a mathematics educator and a science educator collaborated to teach preservice teachers how to design integrated project-based lessons. We found that the preservice teachers valued the integrated approach but had difficulty translating their learning to practice in traditional, clinical-based field placements. We report on recommendations for future course iterations.

**Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.**

### References

Allen, J. M., & *Wright,* S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. *Teachers and Teaching, 20*, 136-151.

Bambino, D. (2002). Critical friends. *Educational Leadership, 59* (6), 25-27.

Barab, S. A. (1999). “Ecologizing” instruction through integrated units. *Middle School Journal, 31*(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1999.11494605

Baran, M. & Maskan, A. (2010). The effect of project-based learning on pre-service physics teachers electrostatic achievements. *Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5*, 243–257.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. *The Clearing House, 83*, 39 – 43.

Berlin, D. F., & Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. *School Science and Mathematics, 105*, 15–24.

Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1994). The berlin-white integrated science and mathematics model. *School Science and Mathematics, 94*, 2–4.

Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. *Educational Psychologist, 26*, 369–398.

Boaler, J. (2001). Mathematical modelling and new theories of learning. *Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 20*(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/20.3.121

Boaler, J. (2002a). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33*, 239-258.

Boaler, J. (2002b). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. *Studies in mathematical thinking and learning*. New York, NY: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Boaler, J. (2016). *Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching*. San Francisco, VA: Jossey-Bass.

Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of railside school. *Teachers College Record, 110*, 608–645.

Boss, S. (2011). How to get projects off to a good start. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/summer-pd-starting-projects-suzie-boss

Braden, S. S. (2012). *Differences in perceptions of learning and academic achievement of students and teachers in project-based learning and balanced mathematics classrooms*. Tennessee State University.

Buck Institute for Education. (2018a). 6-12 collaboration rubric (non-CCSS). Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/object/document/6_12_collaboration_rubric_non_ccss

Buck Institute for Education. (2018b). Project design: Overview and student learning guide. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/object/document/project_design_overview_and_student_learning_guide

Buck Institute for Education. (2018c). Project design rubric. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/object/document/project_design_rubric

Buck Institute for Education. (2018d). What is project-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/about/what_pbl

Buck Institute for Education. (2018e). Rubrics. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/objects/cat/rubrics

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). *The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness*. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Bybee, R. W. (2009). *The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills*. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Caprano, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., & Helfeldt, J. (2010). Do differing types of field experiences make a difference in teacher candidates’ perceived level of competence?. *Teacher Education Quarterly, 37*(1), 131-154.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). *Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions* (4th ed.). Washington D.C.: Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (1938). *Experience and education. *Education (Vol. 50). New York, NY: Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Frank, M., & Barzilai, A. (2004). Integrating alternative assessment in a project-based learning course for pre-service science and technology teachers. *Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29* (1), 41 – 61.

Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers. *School Science and Mathematics, 105*, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. *International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13*, 1089 – 1113.

Hattie, J., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2017). *Visible learning for mathematics: What works best to optimize student learning*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Hough, D. L., & St. Clair, B. (1995). The Effects of Integrated Curricula on Young Adolescent Problem-Solving. *Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 19*(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848959.1995.11670058

Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. *School Science and Mathematics, 98*, 320–327.

Koirala, H. P., & Bowman, J. K. (2003). Preparing middle level preservice teachers to integrate mathematics and science: Problems and possibilities. *School Science & Mathematics, 103*, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18231.x

Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). *Project-based learning. In the cambridge handbook of learning sciences*. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). *Setting the standard for project based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction.* Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). *Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers* (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

McDonald, J., & Czerniak, C. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples. *School Science & Mathematics, 94*, 5–10.

McGehee, J. J. (2001). Developing interdisciplinary units: a strategy based on problem solving. *School Science and Mathematics, 101*, 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17972.x

Merlo, S. (2011). *An exploration of project-based learning activities versus traditional teaching methods in a high school mathematics setting*. Kean University.

Moursund, D. (1999). *Project-based learning using information technology*. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). *Principles and standards for school mathematics.* Reston, VA: NCTM.

NCTM. (2014). *Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All.* Reston, VA: NCTM.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). *Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2009). *Framework for 21st century learning*. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework

Pink, D. H. (2005). *A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future*. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.

Thomas, J. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Retrieved November 26,

2015, from http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf

Virginia Department of Education. (2009). *Mathematics standards of learning for Virginia public schools*. Richmond, VA.

Virginia Department of Education. (2016). *Mathematics standards of learning for Virginia public schools*. Richmond, VA.

Virginia Department of Education. (2017). Profile of a graduate. Retrieved from http://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/graduation/profile-grad/

Yancy, Y. G. (2012). *The effects of project-based learning activities on intrinsic motivation and skill acquisition of rural middle school math students*. Union University.

Yasar, O., Maliekal, J., Little, L., & Veronesi, P. (2014). An interdisciplinary approach to professional development for math, science, and technology teachers. *Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33*, 349-374.

Wilhelm, J., Sherrod, S., & Walters, K. (2008). Project-Based Learning Environments: Challenging Preservice Teachers to Act in the Moment. *Journal of Educational Research, 101*, 220 – 233.

Zeichner, K., & Bier, M. (2015). Opportunities and pitfalls in the turn toward clinical experience in US teacher education. In E. R. Hollins (Ed.), *Rethinking clinical experiences in preservice teacher education: Meeting new challenges for accountability* (pp. 20 – 46). New York: Routledge.