This article explores the integration of culturally relevant practices and student expertise into lesson planning in a university-level science methods course for preservice elementary teachers (PSETs). The project utilized a conceptual framework that combines food pedagogy and funds of knowledge, modeling an approach to lesson design that PSETs can use in their future classrooms to bring students’ worldviews to the forefront of science learning. The article gives an overview of the conceptual framework and the origins of the project. It describes the steps involved in the design, review, and delivery of lessons by PSETs and discusses implications for instructional practices in science teacher education and science learning in elementary schools. The article concludes with a discussion of major outcomes of the use of this framework, as evidenced by PSET pre- and post- project reflections: student-centered curriculum development, increased PSET self-confidence, integrated learning for both PSET and the students, and sustained levels of engagement.
Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.
Abarca, M. (2006). Voices in the kitchen: views of food and the world from working-class Mexican and Mexican-American women. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
Alvarez, S. (2017). Community Literacies en Confianza: Learning from Bilingual After-School Programs. Urbana, Illinois: NCTE.
Benavides, R., & Medina-Jerez, W. (2017). No Puedo, I don’t get it: Assisting Spanglish- speaking students in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 84(4), 30-35.
Bouillion, L. M. & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898.
Bryan, L. A., Tippins, D. J. (2005). The Monets, Van Goghs, and Renoirs of science education: Writing impressionist tales as a strategy for facilitating prospective teachers’ reflections on science experiences. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 227-239.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science & Children, 51(8), 10-13.
Creel Falcon, K. (2018). Friday night tacos: Exploring Midwestern borderlands through familial women’s oral histories. The Journal of Mujeres Activas en Letras y Cambio Social, 17(2), 66-93.
DePaola, T. (1978). The popcorn book. Holiday House.
Flowers, R., & Swan, E. (2012). Introduction: Why food? Why pedagogy? Why adult education? Australian Journal of Adult Learning. 52, 419-430.
Gallard, A. J. (1992). Creating a multicultural learning environment in science classrooms. F. Lawrenz, K. Cochran, J. Krajcik & P. Simpson, Research matters…To the science teacher, 51-58.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge (1st ed. Vol. 2009 Reprint). New York: Routledge.
Hammond, L., & Brandt, C. B. (2004). Science and cultural process: Defining an anthropological approach to science education. Studies in Science Education 40, 1- 47.
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95, 145-167.
Jegede, O. (1994). Traditional Cosmology and Collateral Learning in Non-Western Science Classrooms. Research and Evaluation Unit Distance Education Center. University of Southern Queensland. Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34, 159-165.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 74-84.
Mensah, F. M. (2011). A case for culturally relevant teaching in science education and lessons learned for teacher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 80, 296-309.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nieto, S. (2004). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Steinberg, R., Wyner, Y., Borman, G., & Salame, I. L. (2015). Targeted courses in inquiry science for future elementary school teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(6), 51-56.
Swan, E. & Flowers, R. (2015). Clearing up the table: Food pedagogies and environmental education—contributions, challenges and future agendas. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 146-164.
Van Maanen, J. (1998). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Windschitl, M. (2006). Why we can’t talk to one another about science education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 349-355.
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2017). A recipe for friendship: similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1-10.