Abstract
Online coursework in science teacher education is becoming increasingly common. However, some content in science teacher education—how to skillfully (and safely) lead laboratory investigations, for instance—can pose a particular challenge when converted to an online format. We describe how we met this challenge in the creation of an online version of a practice-based science methods course focused on leading inquiry-based labs. Specifically, we articulate the design principles that guided our transition to a fully online course that produced student outcomes comparable to in-person sections and generated consistent, highly positive feedback from our graduate students. Additionally, by designing an online course that retained the teaching of lab competencies classically taught in person, we positioned the institution to better support students and instructors who found themselves suddenly online when the COVID-19 pandemic struck in the spring of 2020.
Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.
References
Dani, D. E., & Donnelly, D. (2021). Experiential learning in an online science methods course. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 6(3). https://innovations.theaste.org/fs-experiential-learning-in-an-online-science-methods-course/
Davis, E. A., Kloser, M., Wells, A., Windschitl, M., Carlson, J., & Marino, J.-C. (2017). Teaching the practice of leading sense-making discussions in science: Science teacher educators using rehearsals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2017.1302729
Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(10), S70–S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
Fosslien, L., & West Duffy, M. (2020, April 29). How to combat Zoom fatigue. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/04/how-to-combat-zoom-fatigue
Grossman, P. (2011). Framework for teaching practice: A brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836–2843. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301205
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009) Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Skrypnyk, O., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). This history and state of online learning. In G. Siemens, D. Gašević, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning (pp. 93–131). MOOC Research Initiative. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/preparing-for-the-digital-university-a-review-of-the-history-and-
Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A Delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21171
Major, C. H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.38784
Miller, K. W. (2008). Teaching science methods online: Myths about inquiry-based online learning. Science Educator, 17(2), 80–86.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Science and engineering for Grades 6–12: Investigation and design at the center. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25216
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
PhET Interactive Simulations, University of Colorado. (2021). Pendulum lab. https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/pendulum-lab
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L. & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf
Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Contribution of learner–instructor interaction to sense of community in graduate online education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 248–260. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol8no4/shackelford_1212.pdf
TeachingWorks, University of Michigan School of Education. (2022). High leverage practices. Retrieved March 2022 from https://www.teachingworks.org/high-leverage-practices/
Volkmann, M. J., & Abell, S. K. (2003). Rethinking laboratories: Tools for converting cookbook labs into inquiry. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 38–41. https://www.nsta.org/journals/science-teacher/science-teacher-september-2003/rethinking-laboratories-tools-converting
Veletsianos, G., Johnson, N., & Seaman, J. (2021). Digital faculty: Faculty expectations about the future of higher education. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitalfaculty-futures.pdf
Windschitl, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2016). Rigor and equity by design: Locating a set of core teaching practices for the science education community. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1099–1158). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_18
Windschitl, M. A., & Stroupe, D. (2017). The three-story challenge: Implications of the Next Generation Science Standards for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117696278