Participatory Action Research as Pedagogy in Elementary Science Methods

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Askew, R. (2021). Participatory Action Research as Pedagogy in Elementary Science Methods. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 6(3). Retrieved from
by Rachel Askew, Vanderbilt University


Participatory action research (PAR) is a methodology where the traditional lines dividing researchers and participants are blurred. In this article, a description of how PAR was used to cocreate a science methods course is explored with specific focus on the challenges and benefits it can bring to teacher education. Using PAR as pedagogy provided a way of teaching that centered students’ questions, experiences, ideas, and perceived needs as future science teachers. This way of teaching impacted our class community and opened space for students to create their own meanings of science and views of themselves as science teachers.

Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.

Become a member or renew your membership


Adriansen, H. K. (2012). Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies, 3(1), 40–55.

Avraamidou, L. (2014). Tracing a beginning elementary teacher’s development of identity for science teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 223–240.

Avraamidou, L. (2016). Telling stories: Intersections of life histories and science teaching identities. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 153–176). Sense Publishers.

Barton, A. C., Johnson, V., & The students in Ms. Johnson’s Grade 8 science classes. (2002). Truncating agency: Peer review and participatory research. Research in Science Education, 32(2), 191–214.

Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Smith, D. (2006). Glossary: Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(10), 854–857.

Birmingham, D., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286–314.

Birmingham, D., Calabrese Barton, A., McDaniel, A., Jones, J., Turner, C., & Rogers, A. (2017). “But the science we do here matters”: Youth‐authored cases of consequential learning. Science Education, 101(5), 818–844.

Brydon‐Miller, M., & Maguire, P. (2009). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 79–93.

Castillo-Burguete, M. T., García-Gómez, C., Castro-Borges, P., & Dickinson, F. (2015). ‘I’m not afraid of him; that dog barks but he don’t bite.’ PAR processes, gender equity and emancipation with women in Yucatán, Mexico. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research (3rd ed., pp. 291–300). SAGE.

Emdin, C. (2016). For white folks who teach in the hood . . . and the rest of y’all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Beacon Press.

Fornet-Betancourt, R., Becker, H., & Gomez-Müller, A. (Gauthier, J. D., Trans.). (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.

Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125.

hooks, b. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.

Kohn, A. (1993). Choices for children: Why and how to let students decide. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 8–16, 18–20.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing.

Lewis, M. E. (2004). A teacher’s schoolyard tale: Illuminating the vagaries of practicing participatory action research (PAR) pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 10(1), 89–114.

Luehmann, A. (2016). Practice-linked identity development in science teacher education: GET REAL! Science as a figured world. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 15–47). Sense Publishers.

Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (Eds.). (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.

Mensah, F. M. (2016). Positional identity as a framework to studying science teacher identity: Looking at the experiences of teachers of color. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 49–69). Sense Publishers.

Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2004). Co-generative dialoguing and metaloguing: Reflexivity of processes and genres. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 5(3), Article 7.

Sharma, A., & Muzaffar, I. (2012). The (non)making/becoming of inquiry practicing science teachers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 175–191.

Siry, C., & Martin, S. N. (with Baker, S., Lowell, N., Marvin, J., & Wilson, Y.). (2010). Coteaching in science education courses: Transforming teacher preparation through shared responsibility. In C. Murphy & K. Scantlebury (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 57–78). Springer.

Tobin, K. (2006). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Teaching Education, 17(2), 133–142.

Udas, K. (1998). Participatory action research as critical pedagogy. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(6), 599–628.

Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2018). Ambitious science teaching. Harvard Education Press.