Adaptive learning allows students to learn in customized, non-linear pathways. Students demonstrate prior knowledge and thus focus their learning on challenging content. They are continually assessed with low stakes questions allowing for identification of content mastery levels. A science methods course for preservice teachers piloted the use of adaptive learning. Design and implementation are described. Instructors need to realistically consider the time required to redesign a course in an adaptive learning system and to develop varied and numerous assessment questions. Overall, students had positive feelings toward the use of adaptive learning. Their mastery levels were not as high as anticipated by the instructor. The student outcomes on their summative assessment did not show high levels of transfer of the key content.
Keywords: Adaptive Learning, Science Methods, Pedagogy, Course Design
Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.
Anderson, P. (n.d.). Bozeman Science. Retrieved from http://www.bozemanscience.com/next-generation-science-standards/
Bybee, R. (2002). Learning science and the science of learning. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Chen, B, Bastedo, K., Kirkley, D., Stull, C., & Tojo, J. (2017, August). Designing personalized adaptive learning courses at the University of Central Florida. Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/8/designing-personalized-adaptive-learning-courses-at-the-university-of-central-florida
Dziuban, C. Howlin, C., Johnson, C., & Moskal, P. (2017, December, 18). An adaptive learning partnership. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/12/an-adaptive-learning-partnership
Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P.D., Cassisi, J., & Fawcett, A. (2016, September). Adaptive learning in psychology: Wayfinding in the digital age. Online Learning, 3, 74-96.
Dziuban, C.D., Moskla, P.D., & Hartman, J. (2016, September 30). Adapting to learn, learning to adapt. Research bulletin. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
Educause Learning Initiative (ELI). (2017, January). 7 Things You Should Know About Adaptive Learning. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/1/7-things-you-should-know-about-adaptive-learning
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. The Science Teacher 70(6), 39-72.
Feldman, M. (2013, December 17). What faculty should know about adaptive learning. e-Literate blog. Retrieved from https://mfeldstein.com/faculty-know-adaptive-learning/
Haysom, J., & Bowen, M. (2010). Predict, observe, explain: Activities enhancing scientific understanding. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Howlin, C., & Lunch, D. (2014). A framework for the delivery of personalized adaptive content. In 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL): 1-5. Retreieved from http://realizeitlearning.com/papers/FrameworkPersonalizedAdaptiveContent.pdf
Konicek-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ogle, D.M. 1986. K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Richhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: how to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sloan, A. & Anderson, L. (2018, June 18). Adaptive learning unplugged: Why instructors matter more than ever. EDUCASE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/6/adaptive-learning-unplugged-why-instructors-matter-more-than-ever
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, 2nd edition. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.