STEM Teacher Leader Collaborative: A Responsive Professional Learning Network With Radical Hope

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Mercier, A. (2022). STEM Teacher Leader Collaborative: A responsive professional learning network with radical hope. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 7(3). Retrieved from https://innovations.theaste.org/stem-teacher-leader-collaborative-a-responsive-professional-learning-network-with-radical-hope/
by Alison Mercier, University of Wyoming

Abstract

Many elementary teachers in the United States receive little to no STEM-focused professional learning during an average school year. When elementary teachers do participate in professional learning opportunities focused solely on STEM teaching and learning, they are often positioned as novices in need of improvement or instruction rather than colearners and cocontributors to the learning community. In this article, I describe the STEM Teacher Leader Collaborative as one way to address current challenges in STEM-focused professional learning and as an infrastructure for responsive teacher learning. I highlight the STEM Teacher Leader Collaborative as a model of a responsive professional learning network with radical hope, describing its guiding principles and the meanings teachers make of their experience within the network.

Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.

Become a member or renew your membership

References

Anderson, B. E., & Gallagher, M. A. (2019). Responsive professional development for vocabulary instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 41(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1616632

Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research. http://horizon-research.com/NSSME/2018-nssme/research-products/reports/technical-report

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003

Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (with Espinoza, D.). (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

David, S. (2016). Emotional agility: Get unstuck, embrace change, and thrive in work and life. Avery.

Dotger, S. (2015). Methodological understandings from elementary science lesson study facilitation and research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9427-2

Edgoose, J. (2009). Radical hope and teaching: Learning political agency from the politically disenfranchised. Educational Theory, 59(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00309.x

Gannon, K. M. (2020). Radical hope: A teaching manifesto. West Virginia University Press.

Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158

Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169

Lear, J. (2006). Radical hope: Ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674040021

Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003010

Lindvall, J., & Ryve, A. (2019). Coherence and the positioning of teachers in professional development programs. A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 27, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.005

Mercier, A. K. (2020). Channeling your inner science warrior: The nature of teachers’ professional agency in high-needs schools (Publication No. 27999723) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Nolan, A., & Molla, T. (2018). Teacher professional learning through pedagogy of discomfort. Reflective Practice, 19(6), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1538961

Robertson, A.D., Atkins, L.J., Levin, D.M., & Richards, J. (2015). What is responsive teaching? In Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 1-35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315689302

Russ, R. S., Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., & Hutchison, P. (2009). Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking. Science Education, 93(5), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20320

Settlage, J., & Johnston, A. (2014). The crossroads model. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 67–70.

Thompson, J., Richards, J., Shim, S.-Y., Lohwasser, K., Von Esch, K. S., Chew, C., Sjoberg, B., & Morris, A. (2019). Launching networked PLCs: Footholds into creating and improving knowledge of ambitious and equitable teaching practices in an RPP. AERA Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419875718

Watkins, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Dini, V. (2020). Facilitating scientific engagement online: Responsive teaching in a science professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(5), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1727622