Training Preservice Science Teachers to Teach Inclusively

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Watts, E. M. (2022). Training Preservice Science Teachers to Teach Inclusively. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 7(1). Retrieved from
by Elizabeth M. Watts, University of Kassel


The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was adopted in 2006. Since its ratification, the educational landscape has rapidly changed because inclusion requires a radical restructuring of mainstream schooling. At the classroom level, adaptations must be made to course materials, teaching approaches, testing, and other aspects of classroom teaching to meet the needs of an increasingly heterogeneous student body. To prepare future teachers to meet the objectives set forth in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), it is necessary to develop preservice course modules that specifically cultivate sensitivity toward students with disabilities and train preservice teachers in how to adapt their teaching to accommodate students with disabilities or chronic illnesses. This type of training is critically important for preservice science teachers. The idea of inclusive education can be particularly daunting because of the complexity of science topics and the variety of educational activities that would require adaptation (e.g., course materials, experiments, and excursions). This article outlines an online, project-oriented module that effectively increased preservice science teachers’ positive views on inclusion and their self-efficacy in terms of accommodating effectively.

Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.

Become a member or renew your membership


Abels, S. (2017). Science teacher professional development for inclusive practice. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 11(1), 19–29.

Alghazo, E. M., Dodeen, H., & Alqaryouti, I. A. (2003). Attitudes of pre-service teachers towards persons with disabilities: Predictions for the success of inclusion. College Student Journal, 37(4), 515–522.

Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

Bell, P. (2019). Infrastructuring Teacher Learning about Equitable Science Instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 681–690.

Bosse, S., & Spörer, N. (2014). Erfassung der einstellung und der selbstwirksamkeit von lehramtsstudierenden zum inklusiven unterricht [Assessment of attitudes and self-efficacy of preservice teachers towards inclusive education]. Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 6(4), 279–299.

Cook, B. G. (2002). Inclusive attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses of pre-service general educators enrolled in a curriculum infusion teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3), 262–277.

Dembouski, L. M. (with Mielke, K., Lucht, J., Pleski, J., Biderman, N., & Schomberg, M.). (2018). D/HH voices. In M. Koomen, S. Kahn, C. L. Atchinson, & T. A. Wild (Eds.), Towards inclusion of all learners through science teacher education (pp. 15–25). Brill Sense.

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. (2012). Teacher education for inclusion: Profile of inclusive teachers.

Göransson, K., & Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings—A critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265–280.

Heyder, A., Südkamp, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2020). How are teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion related to the social-emotional school experiences of students with and without special educational needs? Learning and Individual Differences, 77, Article 101776.

Holstermann, N. (2019). Inclusive biology education—How do preservice teachers think about inclusion? In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Perspectives in Science Education (8th ed., pp. 330–333). Filodiritto Editore.

Junker, R., Zeuch, N., Rott, D., Henke, I., Bartsch, C., & Kürten, R. (2020). Zur veränderbarkeit von heterogenitäts- einstellungen und -selbstwirksamkeitsüberzeugungen- von lehramtsstudierenden durch diversitätssensible hochschuldidaktische lehrmodule [Changing heterogeneity-related attitudes and perceived self-efficacy of pre-service teachers through diversity-sensitive courses in higher education]. Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 12(1), 45–63.

Kang, D. Y., & Martin, S. N. (2018). Improving learning opportunities for special education needs (SEN) students by engaging pre-service science teachers in an informal experiential learning course. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(3), 319–347.

Kim, J.-R. (2011). Influence of teacher preparation programmes on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 355–377.

Kramer, B. (2015, April 14). Bundesländervergleich zur inklusion: Lehramtsstudenten lernen zu wenig über umgang mit behinderten [Comparison of federal states on inclusion: Student teachers learn too little about dealing with disabled people]. Spiegel Panorama.

Krischler, M., & Pit-ten Cate, I. M. (2019). Pre- and in-service teachers’ attitudes toward students with learning difficulties and challenging behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 327.

Kultusministerkonferenz (2020). Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Report No. 223). Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.

Lautenbach, F., & Heyder, A. (2019). Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: A systematic review. Educational Research, 61(2), 231–253.

Lüke, T., & Grosche, M. (2018). Implicitly measuring attitudes towards inclusive education: A new attitude test based on single-target implicit associations. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(3), 427–436.

Markic, S., & Abels, S. (2014). Heterogeneity and diversity: A growing challenge or enrichment for science education in german schools? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(4), 271–283.

McFarland, J., Hussar, B., de Brey, C., Snyder, T., Wang, X., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Gebrekristos, S., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Barmer, A., Bullock Mann, F., & Hinz, S. (2017). The condition of education 2017 (NCES Report No. 2017-144). National Center for Education Statistics.

McHatton, P. A., & Parker, A. (2013). Purposeful Preparation: Longitudinally Exploring Inclusion Attitudes of General and Special Education Pre-Service Teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(3), 186–203.

Miesera, S., DeVries, J. M., Jungjohann, J., & Gebhardt, M. (2019). Correlation between attitudes, concerns, self‐efficacy and teaching intentions in inclusive education evidence from German pre‐service teachers using international scales. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(2), 103–114.

Ramberg, J., Lénárt, A., & Watkins, A. (Eds.). (2017). European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education: 2014 dataset cross-country report. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education.

Rose, David H; Meyer, Anne (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. ISBN 0-87120-599-8. OCLC 49994086.

Saloviita, T. (2020). Teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of students with support needs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(2), 64–73.

Sharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2008). Impact of training on pre‐service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability & Society, 23(7), 773–785.

Sharma, U., Forlin, C., Loreman, T., & Earle, C. (2006). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes, concerns and sentiments about inclusive education: An international comparison of the novice pre-service teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 21(2), 80–93.

Shippen, M. E., Crites, S. A., Houchins, D. E., Ramsey, M. L., & Simon, M. (2005). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of including students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(2), 92–99.

Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 344–355.

Tournaki, N., & Samuels, W. E. (2016). Do graduate teacher education programs change teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion and efficacy beliefs? Action in Teacher Education, 38(4), 384–398.

United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, December 13, 2006,

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Disability. (n.d.). Factsheet on persons with disabilities. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from

Weiner, H. M. (2003). Effective inclusion: Professional development in the context of the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 12–18.

Weisel, A., & Dror, O. (2006). School climate, sense of efficacy and Israeli teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion of students with special needs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(2), 157–174.

World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. WHO Press.

World Helath Organization. (2021, November 24). Disability and health.

Woodcock, S., & Woolfson, L. M. (2019). Are leaders leading the way with inclusion? Teachers’ perceptions of systemic support and barriers towards inclusion. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 232–242.