Using University Science Courses for Preservice Teacher Internship Experiences

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Kruse, J., Voss, S. (2024). Using University Science Courses for Preservice Teacher Internship Experiences. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 9(3). Retrieved from https://innovations.theaste.org/using-university-science-courses-for-preservice-teacher-internship-experiences/
by Jerrid Kruse, Drake University; & Sarah Voss, Drake University

Abstract

The importance and value of high-quality opportunities to authentically practice teaching is key for new teacher development. Unfortunately, securing high-quality field experiences for preservice teachers is an ongoing problem for many teacher education programs. This article describes how we used our own university-level science content courses to provide preservice secondary teachers with robust teaching experiences through teaching internships. We share our insights from engaging interns for the last ten years, as well as the key elements of the internship experience from the perspective of former interns.

Innovations Journal articles, beyond each issue's featured article, are included with ASTE membership. If your membership is current please login at the upper right.

Become a member or renew your membership

References

Akın, F. N., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2018). The nature of the interplay among components of pedagogical content knowledge in reaction rate and chemical equilibrium topics of novice and experienced chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 80-105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00165G

Allsopp, D. H., DeMarie, D., Alvarez-McHatton, P., & Doone, E. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 19-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478732

Bergman, D. J. (2007). The effects of two secondary science teacher education program structures on teachers’ habits of mind and action (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

Braaten, M. (2019). Persistence of the two‐worlds pitfall: Learning to teach within and across settings. Science Education, 103(1), 61-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21460

Chval, K. B. (2004). Making the complexities of teaching visible for prospective teachers. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.11.2.0091

Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013). The practicum in preservice teacher education: A review of empirical studies. Teaching Education, 24(4), 345-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.711815

Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77-92). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_15

Findlay, M., & Bryce, T. G. (2012). From teaching physics to teaching children: Beginning teachers learning from pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2727-2750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.728012

Fuentes-Abeledo, E. J., González-Sanmamed, M., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & Veiga-Rio, E. J. (2020). Teacher training and learning to teach: An analysis of tasks in the practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1748595

Hanuscin, D. L., & Zangori, L. (2016). Developing practical knowledge of the Next Generation Science Standards in elementary science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(8), 799-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9489-9

Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2013). Teachers’ NOS implementation practices two to five years after having completed an intensive science education program. Science Education, 97(2), 271–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9353-0

Herman, B. C., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2019). The role of informal support networks in teaching the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 49, 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9610-2

Janssen, F., Westbroek, H., & Doyle, W. (2014). The practical turn in teacher education: Designing a preparation sequence for core practice frames. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113518584

Karal, I. S., & Alev, N. (2016). Development of pre-service physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) throughout their initial training. Teacher Development, 20(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1124138

Krajick, J., & Penick, J. (1989). Evaluation of a model science teacher education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260905

Kruse, J. W., Easter, J. M., Edgerly, H. S., Seebach, C., & Patel, N. (2017). The impact of a course on nature of science pedagogical views and rationales. Science & Education, 26(6), 613-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9916-0

Kruse, J., Henning, J., Wilcox, J., Carmen, K., Patel, N., & Seebach, C. (2021). Investigating the correlation between preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and science teaching practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(4), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1861767

Kruse, J., Wilcox, J., Patel, N., Borzo, S., Seebach, C., & Henning, J. (2022). The power of practicum support: A quasi-experimental investigation of elementary preservice teachers’ science instruction in a highly supported field experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(4), 392-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1949099

Lotter, C., Singer, J., & Godley, J. (2009). The influence of repeated teaching and reflection on preservice teachers’ views of inquiry and nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(6), 553-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9144-9

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4

Olson, J. K. (2017). Teacher preparation for science education. In Science Education (pp. 523-537). Brill Sense.

Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all?: The induction experience of beginning science teachers from different teacher preparation programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 963–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20103

Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382

Stroupe, D. (2022). Understanding the role of field experiences in preservice science teacher preparation. In Handbook of Research on Science Teacher Education (pp. 119-131). Routledge.

Stroupe, D., & Gotwals, A. W. (2018). “It’s 1000 degrees in here when I teach”: Providing preservice teachers with an extended opportunity to approximate ambitious instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117709742

Tillotson, J. W., & Young, M. J. (2013). The IMPPACT project: A model for studying how preservice program experiences influences science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 148–161.

Varma, T., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2008). Pre-service elementary teachers’ field experiences in classrooms led by science specialists. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9110-y

Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671